Improving objectivity in assessing community empowerment grant proposals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25047/ijossh.v1i2.5545Keywords:
Community empowerment, Government initiative, Proposal evaluationAbstract
Community empowerment grants is one of many initiatives by the Malaysian government to foster social change, economic development and environmental sustainability at the grassroots' level. Annually, the government through its many ministries offer such grants to non-governmental organisations (NGOs) for community program implementations with a predefined aim, scope and target beneficiaries. Analysis of relevant documents, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions involving representatives of Jabatan Pendaftaran Pertubuhan Malaysia (JPPM) and local NGOs is the qualitative method used to enhance the evaluation of community program grant proposals, particularly with the aim to ensure objectivity, fairness and transparency. In this paper, preliminary studies for developing scoring rubric to address the above issue, drawing from extensive review of current practices and responses received from both the government and the NGOs. The assessment is designed around dimensions of community empowerment deliverables, measurable outcomes, implementation capacity, risk management, and program sustainability, each with their own set of indicators. Additionally, this paper also explored the challenges and potential for the application of the scoring rubric for different type of grants, projects or users. In conclusion, by providing a clear and consistent tool to evaluation community program proposals, it is believed that the decision-making and evaluation processes for public-funded community programs, and subsequently the positive impact of such initiatives by the government can be further improved.
References
Abdoul H., Perrey C., Amiel P., Tubach F., Gottot S., Durand-Zaleski I. and Alberti C (2012) Peer review of grant applications: Criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices. PLOS ONE 7(9): 1–15.
Adamson, D., & Bromiley, R. (2013). Community empowerment: Learning from practice in community regeneration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(3), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-08-2011-0105
Anderson, D., & Park, S. (2020). Leveraging data for effective grant making. Data-Driven Decision-Making Journal, 6(1), 65-82.
Ansari, S., Munir, K., & Gregg, T. (2012). Impact at the “Bottom of the Pyramid”: The role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 813–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14676486.2012.01042.x
Ariffin, M. D. S. A. (2021, Mac 31). Pemerkasaan komuniti mampu atasi kesan pandemik. Berita Harian. https://www.bharian.com.my/rencana/lain-lain/2021/03/801997/pemerkasaan-komuniti-mampu-atasi-kesan-pandemik
Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.
Dushkova, D., & Ivlieva, O. (2024). Empowering Communities to Act for a Change: A Review of the Community Empowerment Programs towards Sustainability and Resilience. Sustainability, 16(19), 8700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198700
Green, P., & Smith, J. (2022). Bias in grant allocation: A review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 123-145.
Haliza Mohd Zahari, Noor Diyana Fazan Ahmad, Mohd Muhaimin Ridwan Wong, Nurul Naqirah Shukor, Nur Hidayah Roslan, Wan Norhasniah Wan Husin, Fuad Abas (2024) Laporan Akhir Kajian Keberkesanan Geran Malaysian Incentive Community Empowerment (MyICE), Penerbit UPNM
Holmes, L., Cresswell, K., Williams, S., Parsons, S., Keane, A., Wilson, C., Islam, S., Joseph, O., Miah, J., Robinson, E., & Starling, B. (2019). Innovating public engagement and patient involvement through strategic collaboration and practice. Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0160-4
Johnson, F. R., & Wilson, L. M. (2019). Enhancing fairness in nonprofit funding: A case for blind review processes. Nonprofit Funding And Equity Journal, 11(4), 245-260.
Schuller, K. A., Cronin, C. E., Nicks, S. E., Jing, X., Kingori, C., & Morrone, M. (2019). Development and application of a rubric to compare strategies for improving access to health care in rural communities in the United States. Evaluation and Program Planning, 74, 61-68.
Kross, J., & Giust, A. (2019). Elements of research questions in relation to qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Report, 24(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3426
Lew, A. A., Ng, P. T., & Wu, T. C. E. (2020). Community sustainability and resilience: Similarities, differences and indicators. In Tourism and Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 270-279). Routledge.
Mayo, M., Blake, G., Diamond, J., Foot, J., Gidley, B., Shukra, K., & Yarnit, M. (2009). Community empowerment and community cohesion: paralell agendas for community building in England? Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 23–43.
Meyer, C. B. (2001). A Case in Case Study Methodology. Field Methods, 13(4), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X0101300402
Miller, K. L. (2019). Improving grant evaluation processes: The role of standardized criteria and training. Nonprofit Management Review, 22(3), 215-230.
Norhayati Ab Manaf & Abdullah, (2021) Cabaran Penyertaan Komuniti Orang Asli Dalam Program Pembangunan Sosial: Kajian Kes Di Perkampungan Sungai Pergam, Kemaman, Terengganu. Jurnal Dunia Pengurusan,Vol. 3, No. 1, 9-22,
O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., and Nicholl, J. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ Clinical Research 341(sep17 1), c4587. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4587
OECD (2018). Effective operation of competitive research funding systems. OECD Publishing: Paris.
Rizal Indra Priambada, Rahmad Hidayat & Wahyu Purwanto (2020) Evaluation of Community Empowerment Program Based on Community Satisfaction Index. E3S Web of Conferences 232, 01009 EDP Sciences.
Robinson, E., & Brown, N. (2017). Transparency in grant allocation: building trust with stakeholders. Public Funding and Accountability Journal, 8(3), 212-229.
Siti Sarah (2015, April 26). Bab 3: Metodologi kajian. https://crazylinguists.wordpress.com/category/siti-sarah-a141264/bab-3-metodologi-kajian-sarah/
Smith, A. B., & Jones, T. R. (2018). The role of diversity in grant review panels. Journal of Philanthropic Studies, 14(2), 145-160.
Taylor, S. P. (2018). Innovations in grant assessment: moving towards evidence-based funding. Innovations In Public Policy, 9(2), 100-118.
Thomas, M., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Evaluating grant proposals: the role of scoring rubrics in promoting fairness and transparency. International Journal of Grant Administration, 12(1), 15-30.
Thompson, R. (2020). Digital tools for objective grant review. Grant Review Quarterly, 30(1), 78-89.
Wan Nurul Wahidah Wan Lanang & Muhamad Sayuti Hassan, 2021 Program Pencegahan Jenayah di Negeri Perak melalui Peranan Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) dan Masyarakat. Jurnal Perspektif Jilid 13, Bil. 1, 85-101
Westall, A. (2021). Volunteer street patrols: responsibilised and motivated volunteering in community safety. Safer Communities, 20(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/sc-05-2020-0019
Williams, L., & Carter, M. (2021). Community needs assessments: best practices for data collection. Social Development Research, 12(4), 301-317.
Zainuddin Azizan, Suhaimi A. Samad, Yusof, Radduan Yusof & Farahdila Rahmat (2021). Memperkasakan Peranan Pemimpin Komuniti Satu Pendekatan. In book: Mendepani Pandemik Covid19: Bukti Empirikal daripada Hasil Penyelidikan. UITM Publisher
Zhang, H., & Thompson, C. (2021). Impact assessment models for community development grants. International Journal of Community Development, 13(1), 89-104.
