Digital Signal Processing and Machine Learning for Exam Fraud Detection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25047/ijossh.v2i1.5667Keywords:
Proctoring System, Academic Integrity, Digital Signal Processing, Image ProcessingAbstract
One of the main issues that presents difficulty in online learning settings is academic dishonesty. In these environments, traditional proctoring techniques are not always successful; hence, a new hybrid system is under development to address the problem. This creative system detects cheaters in the act by combining digital signal processing and image processing. Multiple cameras in the image processing component of the system monitor students during tests and flag any suspicious activity, including too forceful hand gestures or head movements. Simultaneously, the digital signal processing element finds any illegal devices and blocks internet access to stop digital cheating. Under tests, the system produced some rather outstanding results. It was 100% successful in blocking internet access and able to correctly identify illegal devices 96% of the time and aberrant physical movements 80% of the time. Over current approaches that only use one of these techniques, the twin approach of tracking behaviour and identifying devices represents a significant improvement. The system still has certain constraints and is not flawless, though. The accuracy rate falls to 65% in noisy or complicated surroundings, which emphasises the need for more improvement. Schools and colleges wishing to put sensible plans into action to stop cheating and uphold academic integrity will find great use for this study.
References
Archer, E. (2023). Technology-driven proctoring: Validity, social justice and ethics in higher education. Perspective in Education. https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v41i1.6666
Das, A. (2015). Guide to Signals and Patterns in Image Processing. 1–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14172-5
Dendir, S., & Maxwell, R. (2020). Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring. 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100033
Kuleva, M., & Miladinov, O. (2024). Exploring The Efficacy of Online Proctoring in Online Examinations: A Comprehensive Review. Environment. Technologies. Resources. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2024vol2.8058
Lee, K., & Fanguy, M. (2022). Online exam proctoring technologies: Educational innovation or deterioration? British Journal of Educational Technology, 53, 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13182
Nguyen, X.-A., Nguyen, S.-N., Nguyen, T.-T.-T., Luong, D.-H., & Tran, T.-G. (2022). Exploring some academic dishonesty in remote online exams of Vietnamese high school students in context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2022/v33i130782
Nigam, A., Pasricha, R., Singh, T., & Churi, P. P. (2021). A Systematic Review on AI-based Proctoring Systems: Past, Present and Future. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10597-x
Slusky, L. (2020). Cybersecurity of Online Proctoring Systems. Journal of International Technology and Information Management. https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1445
Wakchaure, S., Tambe, A., Gadhave, P., Sandanshiv, S., & Kadam, Mrs. A. (2023). Smart Exam Proctoring System. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.51358

