Mortalitas dan bobot badan tiga strain ayam broiler pada kepadatan kandang yang berbeda

Authors

  • Asep Setiaji Universitas Diponegoro
  • Nurfaizin Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Jawa Tengah
  • Binti Ma’rifah Universitas Diponegoro
  • Lilik Krismiyanto Universitas Diponegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25047/jipt.v5i1.2779

Keywords:

Close house, Cobb, CP 707, General Linear Model, Loghman

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of strain, density and their interaction on mortality and body weight of broiler chicken raised in the closed houses. The data was obtained from 60 broiler farms in the Central Java province. Three strains were Cobb, CP 707, and Loghman. The density level was classified into three groups:  £10,  >10 to <15, and  ³ 15 birds/m2. Parameters observed were mortality and body weight in the first week to the fifth week (M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5) and (BB1, BB2, BB3, BB4 dan BB5), respectively. Test of significance effect for strain and density was performed using Mixed procedure of Statistical Analysis System (SAS) University Edition V.6p.2. software. The results showed that density was significant (P<0,01) on the first week (M1), their interaction was (P<0,01) on M1 and (P<0,05) on the fourth week (M4), but not significant on body weight. The conclusion from this study there was an interaction between genetic and environment on mortality one week after chick in and nearly harvesting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bell, D. D., & Weaver, W. D. (2002). Book Review Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production 5th Edition. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.

Campoj, L., Gilm, G., & Davila, S.G. (2005). Effect of intermingling chicks and bird density on fear and stress responses in chickens. Archiv fur Geflügelkunde, 69(5), 199–205.

Estevez, I. (2007). Density allowances for broilers: where to set the limits?. Poultry Sceince, 86, 1265-1272. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.6.1265

Gholami, M., Chamani, M., Seidavi, A., Sadeghi, A. A., & Aminafschar, M. (2020). Effects of stocking density and environmental conditions on performance, immunity, carcase characteristics, blood constitutes, and economical parameters of cobb 500 strain broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 19(1), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1757522

Hall, A.L. (2001). The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially. Animal Welfare, 10,23-40.

Linhoss, J., Purswell, J., Magee, C., & Chesser, D. (2021). Research Note: Effect of stocking density on crop fill progression in broilers grown to 14 d. Poultry Science, 100(3),1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.080

Mahmud, A. T. B. A., Afnan, R., Ekastuti, D. R., & Arief, I. I. (2017). Profil darah, performans dan kualitas daging ayam persilangan kampung broiler pada kepadatan kandang berbeda. Jurnal Veteriner, 18(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.19087/jveteriner.2017.18.2.247

Martindah, E., & Dhenastri, V.O. (2020). Tingkat mortalitas dan afkir ayam broiler di kandang terbuka dan tertutup (mortality rate and culling of broiler in the open and closed house). https://doi.org/10.14334/Pros.Semnas.TPV-2020-p.692-702

Muwarni, R. (2010). Broiler Modern. Semarang: Widya Karya.

Nuriyasa, I.M. (2003). Pengaruh tingkat kepadatan dan kecepatan angin dalam kandang terhadap indeks ketidaknyamanan dan penampilan ayam pedaging. Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan, 2(6), 40-45.

Onbaşılar, E.E.,Poyraz Ő.,Erdem E.,Őztűrk H.(2008). Influence of lighting periods and stocking densities on performance, carcass characteristics and some stress parameters in broiler, Archiv fur Geflügelkunde, 72(5), 193–200.

Qaid, M., Albatshan, H., Shafey, T., Hussein, E., & Abudabos, A. M. (2016). Effect of stocking density on the performance and immunity of 1-to 14-d- old broiler chicks. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola, 18(4), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0289

SAS. (2011). Sas/Stat 9.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 8640. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Sas/stat+9.3#1

Skomorucha, I., Muchacka, R., Sosnowka-Czajka, E. & Herbut, E. (2009). Response of broiler chickens from three genetic groups to different stocking densities. Annals Animal Science, 9(2), 175-184. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285668020

Susanti, E. D., Dahlan, M., & Wahyuning, D. (2016). Perbandingan produktivitas ayam broiler terhadap sistem kandang terbuka (open house) dan kandang tertutup (closed house) di UD Sumber Makmur Kecamatan Sumberrejo Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Ternak, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30736/jy.v7i1.5

Torrey, S., Mohammadigheisar, M., Nascimento dos Santos, M., Rothschild, D., Dawson, L. C., Liu, Z., … Widowski, T. M. (2021). In pursuit of a better broiler: growth, efficiency, and mortality of 16 strains of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 100(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.052

Türkyilmaz, M.K. (2008). The effect of stocking density on stress reaction in broiler chickens during summer. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 32(1),31-36.

Weimer, S. L., Mauromoustakos, A., Karcher, D. M., & Erasmus, M. A. (2020). Differences in performance, body conformation, and welfare of conventional and slow-growing broiler chickens raised at 2 stocking densities. Poultry Science, 99(9), 4398–4407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.009

Wurlina & Meles, D.K. (2012). Teknologi kandang tertutup (closed house) terhadap berat badan, mortalitas dan waktu panen ayam pedaging. Veterinaria Medika, 5(3), 215-218.

Zulfan, & Zulfikar. (2020). evaluasi performa dan income over feed & chick cost (IOFCC) tiga strain ayam broiler yang beredar di Aceh. Jurnal Agripet, 20 (2), 136-142. https://doi.org/10.17969/agripet.v20i2.15410

Published

31-10-2021

How to Cite

Setiaji, A., Nurfaizin, Ma’rifah, B., & Krismiyanto, L. (2021). Mortalitas dan bobot badan tiga strain ayam broiler pada kepadatan kandang yang berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan Terapan, 5(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.25047/jipt.v5i1.2779