Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis Faktor yang Memengaruhi Kualitas Audit di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25047/asersi.v2i2.3559Keywords:
Audit Quality, Literature Review, Content Analysis, Bibliometric AnalysisAbstract
This study aims to explore the factors that influence audit quality in Indonesia. The method used is a systematical literature review. Data analysis technique used is content analysis and bibliometric. research data from 125 articles on audit quality from journals indexed in the Science and Technology Index (Sinta) during 2016-2020. The results show that (1) the most productive researcher is I Dewa Nyoman Badera and Udayana University is the institution that publishes the most research results on audit quality articles in Indonesia, there are 5 dominant factors out of 56 factors that influence audit quality, namely independence, competence , work experience, due professional care, and time budget pressure, the majority of articles use agency theory, data collection techniques use questionnaires with multiple linear regression data analysis techniques. (2) The majority of articles in the field of audit quality are written by two people and collaboration between researchers in the field of audit quality tends to be done with colleagues. (3) Opportunities for further research in the field of audit quality can examine the factors that influence audit quality by referring to research abroad such as computer-assisted audit techniques, role stress, work environment, and auditor compensation, can conduct research using the latest data analysis techniques and link it with other theories, and collaborate between institutions and international collaborations.
Downloads
References
Akhalumeh, P., Agweda, F., & Ogunkuade, Z. (2017). Corporate Characteristics and Audit Quality: Evidence from Quoted Firms in Nigeria. Journal of Scientific Research and Studies, 4(3), 59–66. http://www.modernrespub.org/jsrs/index.htm
Andri, M., Putra, R. C., Saputra, K. R., & Gunawan, S. Y. (2020). Audit Quality Perspectives in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi & Keuangan, 8(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/jpak.v8i2.24341
Broberg, P., Tagesson, T., Argento, D., Gyllengahm, N., & Mårtensson, O. (2017). Explaining the influence of time budget pressure on audit quality in Sweden. Journal of Management and Governance, 21(2), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-016-9346-4
Crucean, A. C., & Hategan, C. D. (2019). The Determinants Factors on Audit Quality: A Theoretical Approach. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, XIX(2), 702–710.
Dr. Umar Sidiq, M.Ag Dr. Moh. Miftachul Choiri, M. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9). http://repository.iainponorogo.ac.id/484/1/Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Di Bidang Pendidikan.pdf
Ernstberger, J., Koch, C., Schreiber, E. M., & Trompeter, G. (2019). Are Audit Firms’ Compensation Policies Associated with Audit Quality? Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(1), 218–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12528
Fachruddin, W., & Handayani, S. (2017). Pengaruh Fee Audit, Pengalaman Kerja, Dan Independensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitasaudit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Kota Medan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 3(2), 144–155. http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jurnalakundanbisnis/article/view/1234
Guffey, E. C. A. and D. M. (2017). A Citation Analysis And Review Of Research Issues And Methodologies In Advances In Accounting Education: Teaching And Curriculum Innovations. Advances in Accounting Education, 21, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1085-462220160000018013
Habib, A., Wu, J., Bhuiyan, M. B. U., & Sun, X. (Sean). (2019). Determinants of auditor choice: Review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Auditing, 23(2), 308–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12163
Handoyo, S., & Putera, P. B. (2012). Tingkat Kolaborasi Peneliti pada Program Insentif : “Semi Top-Down”Kementrian Riset dan Teknologi, Tahun 2008-2010). Warta KMIL, 10(2), 99—114. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2012.3
Jati, R. A. (2020). Audit Tenure Dan Auditor Rotation: Literature Review. Jurnal Akuntansi & Ekonomi Fe Un Pgri Kediri, 5(2), 112–121. https://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/citationstylelanguage/get/modern-language-association?submissionId=13086
Jelic, M. (2012). The Impact Of Ethics On Quality Audit Results. International Journal for Quality Research, 6(4). http://simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=psyc8&AN=2013-99070-189%5Cnhttp://simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au/login?url=http://HH9MG3RW5Q.search.serialssolutions.com/?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_va
Kampai, H. (2020). Kasus-Kasus Melilit KAP Besar di Indonesia. Akuntansi.or.Id. https://akuntansi.or.id/baca-tulisan/44_kasus-kasus-melilit-kap-besar-di-indonesia.html
Khairunisa, A. A., & Yustrianthe, R. H. (2015). Kajian Empiris Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Akuntansi, 10(1), 1–23. http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/wahana-akuntansi/article/view/872
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/30.3.411
Kurniawan, A. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (First Edit). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Kusnandar, S. S., Manalu, R., Oktaviyanti, D., & Fizzanty, T. (2013). Kolaborasi Ilmiah Di Perguruan Tinggi Dan Lembaga Penelitian Sebagai Pengungkit Inovasi Di Industri Berbasis Ilmu Pengetahuan (Science-Based Industry): Studi Kasus Pengembangan Inovasi Medis Berbasis Sel Punca Dan Rekayasa Biologi. Mengurai Stagnasi Inovasi Berbasis Litbang Di Indonesia.
Lopes, A. P. V. B. V., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2018). Evolution of the open innovation paradigm: Towards a contingent conceptual model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132(April 2016), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.014
Messier, W. F. (2014). An approach to learning risk-based auditing. Journal of Accounting Education, 32(3), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2014.06.003
Minh Duc, L. D., Thi Hoang Yen, N., Hoang Ngoc Thuy, V., Hoang Tien, N., & Hung Anh, D. B. (2019). Enhancing auditors’ independence in auditing enterprises in Vietnam. Cogent Economics and Finance, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1602240
Muliawan, E. K., & Sujana, I. K. (2017). Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik, Auditor Switching dan Audit Tenure Pada Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 21(1), 534–561. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/view/33522
Qawqzeh, H. K., Endut, W. A., Rashid, N., Johari, R. J., Hamid, N. A., & Rasit, Z. A. (2018). Auditor Tenure, Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality: A Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 1314–1324. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i12/5229
Ristekdikti. (2018). Ristek Dikti Perketat Kolaborasi Riset Dengan Peneliti Asing. Ristekdikti.Go.Id. https://kabarkampus.com/2018/05/ristek-dikti-perketat-kolaborasi-riset-dengan-peneliti-asing/
Rohanda, R., & Winoto, Y. (2019). Analisis Bibliometrika Tingkat Kolaborasi, Produktivitas Penulis, Serta Profil Artikel Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan Tahun 2014-2018. Pustabiblia: Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.18326/pustabiblia.v3i1.1-16
Sutarsyah. (2014). Kajian Profil Artikel dan Produktivitas Penulis pada Warta Kebun Raya. Visi Misi Pustaka, January 2014, 230–234.
Trihapsari, D. A., & Anisykurlillah, I. (2016). Pengaruh Etika, Independensi, Pengalaman Audit, dan Premature Sign Off Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Accounting Analysis Journal, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v5i1.9756
Tupan. (2017). Analisis Saintometrik Pertumbuhan Literatur Bidang Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Berbasis DataScopusTahun 1996-2016. In Lokakarya Nasional Dokumentasi dan Informasi.
Yazar Soyadı, Y. A., Ismail, K. N. I. K., Amran, N. A., & H. Mohammed, N. (2019). Audit Quality and Accounting Conservatism. Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing Studies (JAFAS), 5(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.32602/jafas.2019.17
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hulifah Hulifah, Sri Pujiningsih
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62e6b/62e6b8687636f55b702ab35d2de0bcc665c72932" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.