Instrumen Audit Kualitas Rekam Medis Elektronik Menggunakan Content Validity Index (CVI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25047/j-remi.v7i4.6748Keywords:
Data Quality Audit, Content Validity Index, Data Quality Management, Electronic Medical Record, Ischemic StrokeAbstract
Although the National Brain Center Hospital Prof. Dr. Mahar Mardjono Jakarta has implemented an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system, the quality of its data has not yet met the completeness standards established by the Indonesian Ministry of Health. As the hospital's most prevalent condition, ischemic stroke requires accurate and complete medical documentation to support effective clinical decision-making. Therefore, a comprehensive EMR audit instrument is needed to systematically evaluate data quality. This study aimed to develop and validate an EMR data quality audit instrument for ischemic stroke patients. A Research and Development (R&D) design was employed using the Data Quality Management (DQM) framework based on the data quality characteristics defined by the American Health Information Management Association. The instrument was validated by six experts using the Content Validity Index (CVI), including the Item-Level Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and the Scale-Level Content Validity Index (S-CVI), with indicators derived from the ischemic stroke clinical pathway. The validation results showed I-CVI values ranging from 0.83 to 1.00 and an S-CVI value of 0.99, indicating excellent content validity. The instrument is therefore considered highly valid and suitable for systematic EMR data quality audits to improve the quality of medical documentation.
References
[1] M. Mashoufi, H. Ayatollahi, D. Khorasani-Zavareh, and T. T. A. Boni, “Data Quality in Health Care: Main Concepts and Assessment Methodologies,” Methods Inf. Med., vol. 62, no. 01/02, pp. 5–18, May 2023, doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761500.
[2] N. Makeleni and L. Cilliers, “Critical success factors to improve data quality of electronic medical records in public healthcare institutions,” SA J. Inf. Manag., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1230.
[3] O. Ozonze, P. J. Scott, and A. A. Hopgood, “Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01892-2.
[4] L. Ehrlinger and W. Wöß, “A Survey of Data Quality Measurement and Monitoring Tools,” Front. Big Data, vol. 5, pp. 1–30, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.850611.
[5] H. Aerts et al., “Quality of Hospital Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data Based on the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) in Heart Failure: Pilot Data Quality Assessment Study,” JMIR Med. Informatics, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1–14, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.2196/27842.
[6] A. Azzahra, W. Astuti, R. Djamaludin, and K. Okky, “Implementasi Penggunaan Rekam Medis Eletronik Rawat Jalan Dalam Masa Peralihan Rekam Medis Konvensional Menuju Rekam Medis Elektronik Di Rumah Sakit Gotong Royong Surabaya,” Mejor. Med. J. Awatara, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–24, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.61434/mejora.v1i1.49.
[7] Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Rekam Medis. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2022.
[8] S. Davoudi et al., “Data Quality Management Model (2015 Update) - Retired,” J. AHIMA, vol. 86, no. 10, pp. 1–15, 2015.
[9] S. Henley-Smith, D. Boyle, and K. Gray, “Improving a Secondary Use Health Data Warehouse: Proposing a Multi-Level Data Quality Framework,” eGEMs (Generating Evid. Methods to Improv. patient outcomes), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.5334/egems.298.
[10] Wang Zhan, Dagtas Serhan, Talburt John, Baghal Ahmad, and Zozus Meredith, “Rule-Based Data Quality Assessment and Monitoring System in Healthcare Facilities,” 2019. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-951-5-460.
[11] M. G. Kahn et al., “A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data,” eGEMs (Generating Evid. Methods to Improv. patient outcomes), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1244.
[12] W. D. Puspitasari and F. Febrinita, “Pengujian Validasi Isi (Content Validity) Angket Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Pembelajaran Daring Matakuliah Matematika Komputasi,” J. Focus Action Res. Math. (Factor M), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 77–90, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.30762/factor_m.v4i1.3254.
[13] M. R. Lynn, “Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity,” Nurs. Res., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 382–386, Nov. 1986, doi: 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017.
[14] D. F. Polit and C. T. Beck, “The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations,” Res. Nurs. Health, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 489–497, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
[15] A. Torsello et al., “A Hospital Medical Record Quality Scoring Tool (MeReQ): Development, Validation, and Results of a Pilot Study,” Healthcare, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–13, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030331.
[16] B. S. Marie, A. Jimmerson, Y. Perkhounkova, and K. Herr, “Developing and Establishing Content Validity of Vignettes for Health Care Education and Research,” West. J. Nurs. Res., vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 677–685, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1177/0193945920969693.
[17] P. Karthik and V. R. Devi, “Content Validity of Assessment Instrument for High-Performance Work Systems in Health Care Industry,” J. Nurs. Meas., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 28–37, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1891/JNM-2022-0034.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuniana Eka Pratiwi, Hosizah Hosizah, Sri Jumiati Agustina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
