KEMAMPUAN KOMPETISI RELATIVE TEBU-PRG EVENT-5 TERHADAP GULMA DAUN SEMPIT DAN DAUN LEBAR MELALUI PENDEKATAN REPLACEMENT SERIES (RELATIVE COMPETITIVE ABILITY OF SUGARCANE EVENT-5 AND ITS PRIMARY WEEDS USING REPLACEMENT SERIES APPROACH)

Authors

  • Netty Ermawati
  • Nurmala Sari
  • Novita Cholifah Ida
  • Bambang Sugiharto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25047/jii.v16i1.113

Abstract

Event-5 is a genetically modified (GM) sugarcane that engineered by introducing the Sucrose-Phosphate Synthase (SPS) gene to enhance the sugar productivity. To fulfill the security requirements of genetically modified products in the safety agriculture and the enviroment, it is necessary to test the competitive ability to the primary weeds which grow in the sugarcane cultivation areas. This study aimed to determine whether the transgenic sugarcane (Event-5) potentially invasive to the weeds at the critical stage of growth, that could effect the environmental balances. This research was conducted at Screen House and Laboratory for Biosciences, State Polytechnic of Jember, designed using the replacement series method in a Randomized Complete Block Design without factorial treatment. The combination treatments were Event-5, Non-transgenic sugarcane (NT) and the weeds (Ciperus rotundus and Portulaca olecarea) densities which consists of thirty-three treatments. The competitive ability test was determined by the rate of vegetative growth and the relative dry weight biomass of Event-5, NT plant and the weeds. The results indicated that the growth rate of Event-5, as well as the accumulation of dry weight of transgenic sugarcane were highly decrease than those of the weeds. The relative crowding coefficient (RCC) value of Event-5 showed lower compared to the P. olecarea weed, and sligtly higher to the C. rotundus weed. The RCC value of weed (C. rotundus) was higher than the RCC value of Event-5, suggested that the weed was potentially invasive to the transgenic sugarcane, and the Event-5 was not potential as a weed. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Awodoyin RO., and Ogunyemi S. 2008. Competitive Ability of Sickepod (Senna obtusifolia L) in combination with Chromolaena odorata (L) K & R and Euphorbia heterophylla L. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension 11, p :25-30.

De Wit CT. 1960. On Competition. Versl. Landbouwk. 66 (8). Wageningen. The Netherlands. 82 pp.

Gioria, M. and Bruce, AO. 2014. Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs. Front Plant Sci. 5:501-510.

Gordberg, DE. and Barton, M. 1992. Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. American Naturalist 139, p 771-801.

Islam, FM. and Karim, SMR. 2003. Effect of population density of Echinochloa crus-galli and Echinochloa colona on Rice. Proceeding 19th Asia-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference. Weed Science of Philippines. Manila. Vol. 1, p:275-280.

Mark, RM, Simberloff D., Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, and Bazzaz FA. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10: 689-710.

Pantone, JD. 1995. Replacement series analysis of the competitive interaction between a weed and a crop as influenced by a plant parasitic nematode. Fundam. appl.Nematol. 18(1). p:81-85.

Park SE., Benjamin LR., and Watkinson, AR. 2003. The theory and application of plant competition models: an agronomic perspective. Ann Bot. 92 (6): 741-748.

Riches, CR., and Valverder, BE, 2002. Agricultural and biological diversity in Latin America: implications for development, testing, and commercial crops. Weed Technol. 16: 200-214.

Sandhi FV., Guntoro D. 2009. Studi Kompetisi Antara Gulma Echinochloa crus-galli dan Tanaman padi (Oryza sativa L.) dengan Pendekatan Replacement Series. Jurnal Institute Pertanian Bogor 3(1).

Sitompul, SM., Guritno B. 1995. Analisis Pertumbuhan Tanaman. Cetakan Pertama. Gadjah Mada Univervcity Press. Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta. 412 pp.

Spitters, CJT., and Van den Bergh JP. 1982. Competition between crop and weeds. In: Holzmer W.. Numata, M. (eds). Niology and ecology of Weeds. p: 137-148.

Tarmani. P, Darmanto. H dan Agresiana. M. 1984. Gulma di Kebun Tebu di Sumatera Utara. Prosiding Pertemuan Teknis Tengah Tahunan II Lahan Kering di Luar Jawa Tahun 1984. Pasuruan . p: 116-120.

Utomo B., Kusmana C., Tjitrosemito S., Nur Aidi M. 2007. Kajian Kompetisi Tumbuhan Eksotik Yang Bersifat Invasif Terhadap Pohon Hutan Pegunungan Asli Taman Nasional Gunung Gede Pangrango. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 13(1 )p: 1-12.

Walck, LJ., Baskin, MJ., Baskin CC. 1999. Relative Competitive Ability and Growth Characteristics of A Norrowly Endemic and A Geographically Widespread Solidago Spesies (Asteraceae). America Journal of Botany 86(6), p: 820-828.

Xu, BC., Xu, WZ., Huang J., Shan, L., Li, FM. 2011. Biomass allocation, relative competitive ability and water efficiency of two dominant species in semiarid Loess Plateau under water stress. Plant Sci. 181(6). p: 644-651.

Published

2016-07-19

How to Cite

Ermawati, N., Sari, N., Ida, N. C., & Sugiharto, B. (2016). KEMAMPUAN KOMPETISI RELATIVE TEBU-PRG EVENT-5 TERHADAP GULMA DAUN SEMPIT DAN DAUN LEBAR MELALUI PENDEKATAN REPLACEMENT SERIES (RELATIVE COMPETITIVE ABILITY OF SUGARCANE EVENT-5 AND ITS PRIMARY WEEDS USING REPLACEMENT SERIES APPROACH). Jurnal Ilmiah Inovasi, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.25047/jii.v16i1.113

Issue

Section

Article