Respond OJK Regulation Number 55: Can Good Corporate Governance Affect Banks Credit Risk in Indonesia?
Keywords:
Good Corporate Governance, POJK Number 55/POJK.03/2016, Credit RiskAbstract
Efforts to reduce the number of non-performing loans continue to be carried out, one of which is by enforcing the rules regarding good corporate governance as enshrined in POJK Number 55/POJK.03/2016. The purpose of this study is to respond to these regulations by testing whether the attributes of good corporate governance can influence bank credit risk. The total population is 44 established banking companies with three years from 2017 to 2019. The data analysis technique uses descriptive statistical analysis and partial hypothesis testing. The results showed that the size of the Board of Directors and the size of the Risk Monitoring Committee harmed credit risk. Meanwhile, the size of the Board of Commissioners, the proportion of Independent Commissioners, the meeting of the Board of Commissioners, and the size of the Audit Committee does not significantly influence bank credit risk.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, A., Muhammad, M., & Narullia, D. (2021). Corporate Risk Disclosure: The Effect Of Corporate Governance. Journal Of Applied Managerial Accounting, 5(1), 101–113.
Ana, L., Ekaningsih, F., & Afkarina, F. I. (2021). Good Corporate Governance Pengaruhnya Pada Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Dan Bisnis, 1(1), 83–94.
Annisa, R. D. N., & Wardhani, R. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Struktur Good Corporate Governance dan Kinerja Terhadap Risiko Kredit Perbankan. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 16(1).
Aryani, K. H. (2019). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Profitabilitas Perbankan Dengan Risiko Kredit Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Pada Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Periode 2014-2016). Distribusi-Journal of Management and Business, 7(1), 63–80.
Atika, R., Husaini, H., & Ilyas, F. (2020). Konsentrasi Kepemilikan, Struktur Dewan Komisaris dan Risiko Kredit Bank yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Fairness, 10(2), 115–124.
Bastomi, M., Salim, U., & Aisjah, S. (2017). The Role of Corporate Governance and Risk Management on Banking Financial Performance in Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 21(4), 670–680.
Bennett, B. (2013). Evidence on the value of director monitoring: a natural experiment. Working Paper, Arizona State University.
Darmadi, S. (2013). Board members’ education and firm performance: evidence from a developing economy. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23(2), 113–135.
Gaur, S. S., Bathula, H., & Singh, D. (2015). Ownership concentration, board characteristics and firm performance: A contingency framework. Management Decision.
Honey, D., Tashfeen, R., Farid, S., & Sadiq, R. (2019). Credit risk management: Evidence of corporate governance in banks of Pakistan. Journal of Finance and Accounting Research, 1(1), 1–18.
Hussain, A., Rehman, A., & Rehman, S. U. (2019). Determinants of the Interest Rate Spread in Commercial Banks of Pakistan. NUML International Journal of Business & Management, 14(2), 30–42.
Lu, J., & Boateng, A. (2018). Board Composition, Monitoring and Credit Risk: Evidence From The UK Banking Industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 51(4), 1107–1128.
Maria, D. (2014). Penerapan Good Corporate Governance dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Risiko Kredit Dan Yield Sukuk Ijarah Korporasi. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi Syariah UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Mathew, S., Ibrahim, S., & Archbold, S. (2017). Corporate governance and firm risk. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(1), 52–67.
Moussa, F. B. (2019). The influence of internal corporate governance on bank credit risk: An empirical analysis for Tunisia. Global Business Review, 20(3), 640–667.
Poudel, R. P., & Hovey, M. (2012). Corporate governance and efficiency in Nepalese commercial banks. Available at SSRN 2163250.
Ratih, N., & Dwi, N. M. (2013). Pengaruh risiko kredit pada kinerja perusahaan dengan good corporate governance sebagai variabel pemoderasi. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 2(4), 265–277.
Saadaa, M. Ben. (2017). The Impact of Control Quality on The Non-Performing Loans of Tunisian Listed Banks. Managerial Auditing Journal.
Setyawati, A. (2016). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance terhadap Kinerja Perbankan dengan Manajemen Risiko Sebagai Variabel Interverning. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 13(1), 13–24.
Situmorang, R., & Hadiprajitno, P. B. (2016). Pengaruh Karakteristik Dewan dan Struktur Kepemilikan terhadap Luas Pengungkapan Sustainability Reporting. Doctoral Dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika Dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro.
Stefanelli, V., & Matteo, C. (2012). An Empirical Analysis on Board Monitoring Role and Loan Portfolio Quality Measurement in Banks. IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc.
Switzer, L. N., & Wang, J. (2013). Default risk estimation, bank credit risk, and corporate governance. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 22(2), 91–112.
Widiastuty, T. (2018). Perbandingan Praktik GCG Bank Syariah dan Konvensional serta Pengaruhnya terhadap Pinjaman Bermasalah. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(2), 247–258.
Yatim, P. (2009). Audit committee characteristics and risk management of Malaysian listed firms. Management & Accounting Review (MAR), 8(1), 19–36.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
