Exploring the coherence between the EFL curriculum policy and its implementation in the higher education setting

Authors

  • Adriadi Novawan Politeknik Negeri Jember
  • Siti Aisyiyah
  • Fitri Wijayanti
  • Asep Samsudin

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a case study which explored the reality of ELT curriculum implementation in the higher education setting in Indonesia in light of the notion of coherence. The study was underpinned by naturalistic inquiry and was intended to know the extent to which the national curriculum policy was implemented in the individual higher education institution through the institutional curriculum policy and in turn was implemented through classroom instructions and experienced by the students. The data were collected by using documentation, interviews, and observations, and analyzed by using the Immersion/Crystallization method. The major finding was that the implementation of the ELT curriculum in the institutional level might not represent the vision of national curriculum policy. The institutional policy announced the application of curriculum on the basis on IQF (Indonesian Qualification Framework), nevertheless, divergent interpretation toward the national policy had led to bias implementation in the level of the department. While most subjects within the overarching (department) curriculum were directed to adopt a strong product-oriented model, the English subjects represented a different reality. 
 
Keywords: higher education, EFL curriculum, coherence, policy, and practice

References

Bernstein, B. (2003) Class, Codes and Control: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge. Borkan, J. (1999) ‘Immersion/Crystallisation’ in Crabtree, B. F. and Miller, W. L. (eds.) Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Burton, N. and Middlewood, D. (2001) ‘Models of Curriculum Organization’ in Middlewood, D. and Burton, N. (eds.) Managing the Curriculum. London: Paul Chapman Publishing. Clark, J.L., Acarino, A., Brownell, J. A. (1994) Improving the Quality of Learning: A Framework for Target-Oriented Curriculum Renewal in Hongkong. Institute of Language in Education: Hongkong Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2000) Research Methods in Education. 5th edn. London: Routledge Falmer. Direktorat Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan-Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi (2014) Buku Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta Finney, D. (2002) ‘The ELT Curriculum: A Flexible Model for a Changing Word’ in Richards, J.C. and Renandya, W.A. (eds.) Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) ‘Five misunderstandings about Case-Study Research‘, Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), pp. 219 – 245. Hargreaves, D. H. (1991) ‘Coherence and manageability: reflections on the National Curriculum and crossâ€curricular provision’, Curriculum Journal, 2(1), pp. 33-41. Howard, J. (2007) ‘Curriculum Development’. Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, Elon University. Available at: http://castor.oit.pdx.edu/sites/www.pdx.edu.cae/files/Howard.pdf (Accessed on 12 December 2012) Kelly, A.V. (2009) The Curriculum: Theory and Practice. 6th edn. London: Sage Publications. Kirkpatrick, A. (2010) ‘English as an Asia Lingua Franca and the Multilingual Model of ELT’, Language Teaching, pp. 1-13. Knight, P. T. (2001) ‘Complexity and Curriculum: A process approach to curriculummaking’, Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), pp. 369-381. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003) ‘Critical Language Pedagogy: A Postmethod perspective on English language teaching’, World Englishes, 22 (4), pp. 539-550. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications

Novawan, A. (2014) ‘English language education in the complexity of academic and professional settings’, Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 1(1), pp. 1-12. Novawan, A., Zuhro, C., & Miqawati, A. H. (2017) ‘Innovative framework for studies of ESP curriculum and pedagogy in the higher education context’, Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 4(1), pp. 1-20. Patton, M. Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Print, M. (1993) Curriculum Development and Design. 2nd edn. NSW: Allen and Unwin. Richards, J.C. (2013) ‘Curriculum Approaches in language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design’, RELC Journal, 44 (1), 5-33 Schiro, M. S. (2013) Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Smith, M. K. (2000) ‘Curriculum theory and practice’, The encyclopaedia of informal education. Available at: www.inf ed.org/biblio/b-curric.htm. (Accessed: June 2013) Wiles, J. and Bondi, J. (2007) Curriculum development: A guide to practice. 7th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Yin, R.K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

Downloads

Published

11-02-2019

How to Cite

Novawan, A., Aisyiyah, S., Wijayanti, F., & Samsudin, A. (2019). Exploring the coherence between the EFL curriculum policy and its implementation in the higher education setting. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 5(1). Retrieved from https://publikasi.polije.ac.id/jeapco/article/view/1259

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>