Enhancing EFL Students’ Recount Writing: A Comparative Analysis of Grammarly, QuillBot, and GrammarCheck Applications

Authors

  • Titik Ismailia Politeknik Negeri Jember
  • Adriadi Novawan Politeknik Negeri Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25047/jeapco.v11i2.5095

Keywords:

EFL writing, grammar checker, Grammarly, QuillBot, GrammarCheck, recount text, automated feedback

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of three AI-powered grammar checker applications—Grammarly, QuillBot, and GrammarCheck—in improving the recount writing skills of EFL students. Fifty-two undergraduate students revised their recount texts using these tools, and data were collected through text analysis and student questionnaires. Results show that all three applications helped reduce grammatical errors and increased students’ awareness of language accuracy, with Grammarly offering the most comprehensive feedback and QuillBot providing valuable paraphrasing support. Despite their benefits, limitations such as surface-level corrections and restricted free features highlight the need for integrating these tools alongside teacher guidance. The findings suggest that grammar checkers can serve as effective supplementary aids in EFL writing instruction when used thoughtfully.

References

Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing Assistance Tools. Education Research International, 2023, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331

Ambarwati, E. K. (2021). Indonesian university students’ appropriating Grammarly for formative feedback. ELT in Focus, 4(1), 1–11. doi: 10.35706/eltinfc.v4il.5216

Amyatun, R. L., and Kholis, A. (2023). Can Artificial Intelligence (AI) like QuillBot AI Assist Students’ Writing Skills? Assisting Learning to Write Texts using AI. ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews, 3(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.22515/elereviews.v3i2.7533

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Ieee Access, 8, 75264-75278.

Chen, T. J. (2023). ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 86(4), 351–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000900

Chui, H. C. (2022). The QuillBot Grammar Checker: Friend or Foe of ESL Student Writers? Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 10(1), 2022.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Mixed Methods Procedures. In Research Defign: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches.

Fitria, T. N. (2021). Grammarly as an AI-powered English Writing Assistant: Students’ Alternative for Writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519

John, P., & Woll, N. (2020). Using grammar checkers in an ESL context. Calico Journal, 37(2), 169-192.

Leacock, C., Chodorow, M., Gamon, M., & Tetreault, J. (2014). Automated grammatical error detection for language learners. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

Miranty, D., Widiati, U., Cahyono, B. Y., & Sharif, T. I. S. T. (2021, December). The effectiveness of using Grammarly in teaching writing among Indonesian undergraduate EFL students. In International seminar on language, education, and culture (ISoLEC 2021) (pp. 41-45). Atlantis Press.

Mohebbi, A. (2024). Enabling learner independence and self-regulation in language education using AI tools: a systematic review. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2433814

Novawan, A., Alvarez-Tosalem, S. M., Ismailia, T., Wicaksono, J. A., & Setiarini, R. B. (2021, January). Students’ experiences of online English language learning by using YouTube. In The First International Conference on Social Science, Humanity, and Public Health (ICOSHIP 2020) (pp. 220-226). Atlantis Press.

Novawan, A., Walker, S. A., & Ikeda, O. (2024). The new face of technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) with artificial intelligence (AI): Teacher perspectives, practices, and challenges. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 10(1), 1-18.

ONeill, R., & Russell, A. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1).

Perdana, I., & Farida, M. (2019). Online Grammar Checkers and Their Use for Efl Writing. Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literature (JETALL), 2(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.20527/jetall.v2i2.7332

Pokrivčáková, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. 7(3), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.2478/JOLACE-2019-0025

Polamuri, S. R., Manikyamba, I. L., & Viswanath, D. G. (2024). Artificial intelligence-driven frameworks for fostering active participation and learning in language classrooms. 01(03), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.62674/ijiee.2024.v1i03.004

Pratama, Y. D. (2020). The Investigation of Using of Grammarly as an Online Grammar Checker in The Process of Writing. English Ideas: Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 46–54.

Puertas, T. H. (2022). Corrective feedback in the EFL classroom: Grammar Checker vs. teacher’s feedback. Universitat Jaume I.

Raheem, B. R., Anjum, F., & Ghafar, Z. N. (2023). Exploring the profound impact of artificial intelligence applications (Quillbot, Grammarly and ChatGPT) on English academic writing: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Integrative Research (IJIR), 1(10), 599-622.

Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it?. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 653-674.

Roe, J., Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2023). A review of AI-powered writing tools and their implications for academic integrity in the language classroom. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 3.

Schmidt, T., & Strassner, T. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Anglistik 33(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.33675/angl/2022/1/14

Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2015). Does language analytical ability mediate the effect of written feedback on grammatical accuracy in second language writing?. System, 49, 110-119.

Turdaliyevna, B. B. (2024). Using artificial intelligence technologies in language teaching. International Journal Of Literature And Languages, 4(11), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/volume04issue11-08

Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1261955.

Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 13943-13967.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-12

How to Cite

Ismailia, T., & Novawan, A. (2025). Enhancing EFL Students’ Recount Writing: A Comparative Analysis of Grammarly, QuillBot, and GrammarCheck Applications. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 11(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.25047/jeapco.v11i2.5095

Issue

Section

Artikel

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>