Development of MetaPolije : Cloud-Based Metabase GIS Data Analysis Platform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25047/tefa.v1i2.4633Keywords:
metapolije, agile method, accurate result, precise location, data analysis toolAbstract
This study aims to discuss the successful development of MetaPolije. MetaPolije is a platform used for cloud-based spatial-text data analysis utilizing the metabase library. MetaPolije as an alternative solution for users who need a medium for textual data analysis while also displaying precise location data. This platform is developed following the stages of agile method, which consists of several stages, from system requirement to testing. The platform has also undergone functional, validity, and performance testing techniques to ensure its efficiency. The test results have shown that the platform is capable of functioning well according to its intended purpose. Additionally, the platform is able to accurately display visualized data analysis results, including precise location points for each datum. Therefore, it can be concluded that the MetaPolije is a viable platform that meets the standards of functional, validity, and performance testing, making it a dependable and effective tool for data analysis. MetaPolije has been successfully developed by providing the basic features needed by users when conducting spatial text data analysis. The test results indicate that MetaPolije has met the quality testing standards for software based on each specified testing indicator, covering functional, validity, and performance aspects. These features can also be customized according to the users' needs and purposes.
References
K. Xu, A. Ottley, C. Walchshofer, M. Streit, R. Chang, and J. Wenskovitch, “Survey on the Analysis of User Interactions and Visualization Provenance,” Comput. Graph. Forum, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 757–783, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1111/cgf.14035.
M. E. Kiger and L. Varpio, “Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Data: AMEE Guide No. 131,” Med. Teach., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 846–854, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030.
T. Sakirin and R. Ben Said, “User Preferences for ChatGPT-Powered Conversational Interfaces Versus Traditional Methods,” Mesopotamian J. Comput. Sci., vol. 2023, pp. 24–31, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.58496/MJCSC/2023/004.
L. F. F. G. Assis et al., “TerraBrasilis: A Spatial Data Analytics Infrastructure for Large-Scale Thematic Mapping,” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 513, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3390/ijgi8110513.
J. M. Heberling, J. T. Miller, D. Noesgaard, S. B. Weingart, and D. Schigel, “Data Integration Enables Global Biodiversity Synthesis,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Feb. 2021, vol. 118, no. 6, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018093118.
A. Bashar, “Intelligent Development of Big Data Analytic for Maufacturing Industry in Cloud Computing,” J. Ubiquitous Comput. Commun. Technol., vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 13–22, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.36548/jucct.2019.1.002.
M. Kuhn and K. Johnson, Feature Engineering and Selection : A Practical Approach for Predictive Models. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2019.
H. Xia, Z. Liu, M. Efremochkina, X. Liu, and C. Lin, “Study on City Digital Twin Technologies for Sustainable Smart City Design: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Geographic Information System and Building Information Modeling Integration,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 84, p. 104009, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104009.
P. D. Ciampa et al., “Streamlining Cross-Organizational Aircraft Development: Results from the AGILE Project,” Jun. 2019, doi: 10.2514/6.2019-3454.
X. Qin, Y. Luo, N. Tang, and G. Li, “Making Data Visualization More Efficient and Effective : A Survey,” VLDB J., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 93–117, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00778-019-00588-3.
W. J. Mak, M. L. A. Aziz, M. R. Hamid, and M. M. H. M. Hashim, “Improving Accessibility of Technical Drilling Applications via Wells on Cloud-based Platform,” May 2023, doi: 10.2118/214541-MS.
A. Bodepudi and M. Reddy, “Cloud-Based Gait Biometric Identification in Smart Home Ecosystem,” Int. J. Intell. Autom. Comput., 2021.
A. Rasheed et al., “Requirement Engineering Challenges in Agile Software Development,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2021, pp. 1–18, May 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/6696695.
F. P. Zasa, A. Patrucco, and E. Pellizzoni, “Managing the Hybrid Organization: How Can Agile and Traditional Project Management Coexist?,” Res. Manag., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 54–63, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/08956308.2021.1843331.
K. Sarangee, J. B. Schmidt, P. B. Srinath, and A. Wallace, “Agile Transformation in Dynamic, High-technology Markets: Drivers, Inhibitors, and Execution,” Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 102, pp. 24–34, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.12.001.
S. Rahy and J. M. Bass, “Managing Non‐Functional Requirements in Agile Software Development,” IET Softw., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 60–72, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1049/sfw2.12037.
J. Angara, S. Prasad, and G. Sridevi, “DevOps Project Management Tools for Sprint Planning, Estimation and Execution Maturity,” Cybern. Inf. Technol., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 79–92, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.2478/cait-2020-0018.
J. C. S. Coutinho, W. L. Andrade, and P. D. L. Machado, “Requirements Engineering and Software Testing in Agile Methodologies : A Systematic Mapping,” in Proceedings of the XXXIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, Sep. 2019, pp. 322–331, doi: 10.1145/3350768.3352584.
P. L. Joshi, “A Review of Agile Internal Auditing: Retrospective and Prospective,” Int. J. Smart Bus. Technol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 13–32, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.21742/IJSBT.2021.9.2.02.
D. Trivedi, “Agile Methodologies,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Commun., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 91–100, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356924683.
C. Janiesch, P. Zschech, and K. Heinrich, “Machine Learning and Deep Learning,” Electron. Mark., vol. 31, pp. 685–695, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2/Published.
W. Ahmad, A. Rasool, A. R. Javed, T. Baker, and Z. Jalil, “Cyber Security in IoT-Based Cloud Computing: A Comprehensive Survey,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 16, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3390/electronics11010016.
P. Kructen, S. Fraser, and F. Coallier, “Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming,” in 20th International Conference XP 2019, 2019, vol. 355, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-19034-7.
H. V. Gamido and M. V. Gamido, “Comparative Review of The Features of Automated Software Testing Tools,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 4473–4478, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v9i5.pp4473-4478.
B. Resnick et al., “Reliability and Validity Testing of the Quantified Quality of Interaction Scale (QuIS),” J. Nurs. Meas., vol. 29, no. 2, p. JNM-D-19-00101, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-19-00101.
A. Ali, H. A. Maghawry, and N. Badr, “Performance Testing as A Service Using Cloud Computing Environment: A survey,” J. Softw. Evol. Process, vol. 34, no. 12, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1002/smr.2492.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rani Purbaningtyas, Moh Munih Dian Widianta, Mochammad Rifki Ulil Albaab
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
