Evaluation Growth of Hydroponic Fodder With Different Lighting Treatment to Increase Forage Productivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25047/tefa.v2i2.5671Keywords:
Forage, Hydroponic Fodder, Lighting TreatmentAbstract
This study was aimed to determine the effect of lighting and plant type on growth of hydroponic fodder to increase forage productivity. This study used a randomized complete factorial design. The first factor was plant type consisted of maize (Zea mays), mung bean (Vigna radiata L) and rice (Oryza sativa). The second factor was lighting treatment consisted of 12 hours and 24 hours. Each treatment was replicated 6 times. The variables measured were plant growth parameters consisted of plant height, leaves number, width of leave and length of leave. Data was analyzed using Analysis of Variety (ANOVA) and the difference between means was analyzed using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The result showed that plant type increase in height, number of leaves, width and length of leave along with the ages plant. Maize showed the highest of plant height and numbers of leaves. Lighting 12 hours showed the best lighting to support plant height, then lighting 24 hours support to width of leaves. The conclusion of the study showed that the best growth results were corn plants with 12-hour lighting treatment.
References
[1] R. Ghorbel and N. Kosum, “Hydroponic fodder production : an alternative solution for feed scarcity hydroponic fodder production : an alternative solution for feed scarcity,” Int. Students Sci. Congr. Proc., 2022, doi: 10.52460/issc.2022.005.
[2] R. Jolad, S. D. Sivakumar, C. Babu, and N. Srithran, “Performance of different crops under hydroponics fodder production system,” Madras Agric. J., vol. 105, no. 1–3, pp. 50–55, 2018.
[3] T. Wahyono, H. Khotimah, W. Kurniawan, D. Ansori, and A. Muawanah, “Karakteristik tanaman sorghum green fodder (sgf) hasil penanaman secara hidroponik yang dipanen pada umur yang berbeda,” J. Ilmu dan Teknol. Peternak. Trop., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 166, 2019, doi: 10.33772/jitro.v6i2.5722.
[4] S. Wulandari, S. B. Kusuma, B. Utomo, and A. N. Respati, “Characterization and production hydroponic fodder for corn (Zea mays) and sorgum (Sorghum bicolor) at different harvest times,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci, 2024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1338/1/012017.
[5] G. Terefe and G. Mengistu, “Effect of feeding hydroponic fodders on the performance of dairy cattle and small ruminants : -a review,” J. Biol. Agric. Healthc., vol. 12, no. 13, 2022, doi: 10.7176/JBAH/12-13-03.
[6] R. Zahera and I. G. Permana, “Utilization of mungbean ’ s green house fodder and silage in the ration for lactating dairy cows,” Media Peternak., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 123–131, 2015, doi: 10.5398/medpet.2015.38.2.123.
[7] T. Wahyono and S. Sadarman, “Hydroponic fodder: alternatif pakan bernutrisi di masa pandemi,” Pros. Semin. Teknol. Agribisnis Peternak. Fak. Peternak. Univ. Jenderal Soedirman, pp. 558–566, 2020.
[8] L. Mulyani, L. Khairani, and I. Susilawati, “Pengaruh penambahan giberelin terhadap pertumbuhan dan persentase batang dan akar tanaman jagung dengan sistem hidroponik,” J. Sumber Daya Hewan, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 6, 2020, doi: 10.24198/jsdh.v1i1.30991.
[9] R. Chrisdiana, “Quality and quantity of sorghum hydroponic fodder from different varieties and harvest time,” 2018.
[10] T. F. Rayani, Y. Resti, and R. K. Dewi, “Kuantitas dan kualitas fodder jagung, padi dan kacang hijau dengan waktu panen yang berbeda menggunakan smart hydroponic Fodder,” J. Ilmu Nutr. dan Teknol. Pakan, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 36–41, 2021.
[11] A. L. Saputro, I. S. Hamid, R. A. Prastiya, and M. T. E. Purnama, “Hidroponik fodder jagung sebagai substitusi hijauan pakan ternak ditinjau dari produktivitas susu kambing sapera,” J. Med. Vet., vol. 1, no. 2, 2018, doi: 10.20473/jmv.vol1.iss2.2018.48-51.
[12] M. M. Farghaly, M. A. M. Abdullah, I. M. I. Youssef, I. R. Abdel-rahim, and K. Abouelezz, “Effect of feeding hydroponic barley sprouts to sheep on feed intake , nutrient digestibility , nitrogen retention , rumen fermentation and ruminal enzymes activity,” Livest. Sci., vol. 228, pp. 31–37, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.07.022.
[13] H. Harwanto, E. Hendarto, B. Bahrun, J. J. Putra, and N. Hidayat, “Pengaruh perbedaan level pupuk urin terfermentasi pada media tanam hidroponik terhadap komposisi dan kecernaan nutrien fodder sorgum,” Livest. Anim. Res., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 274–281, 2021, doi: 10.20961/lar.v19i3.46138.
[14] Sutoyo, “Fotoperiode dan pembungaan tanaman,” Buana Sains, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 137–144, 2011.
[15] Efendi, Halimursyadah, and H. R. Simajuntak, “Respon Pertumbuhan dan produksi plasma nutfah padi lokal aceh terhadap sistem budidaya aerob,” J. Agrista, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 114–121, 2012.
[16] M. Hubballi, N. Sevugapperumal, R. Thiruvengadam, A. Theerthagiri, and R. Samiyappan, “Effect of environmental conditions on growth of alternaria alternata causing leaf blight of noni,” World J. Agric. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 171–177, 2010.
[17] G. S. Alghaniya, L. Khairani, and I. Susilawati, “Pengaruh lama penyinaran menggunakan lampu led terhadap produktivitas fodder hanjeli (Coix lacryma-jobi L.) hidroponik,” ZIRAA’AH, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 38–43, 2021.
[18] T. I. W. Kustyorini, A. T. N. Krisnaningsih, and D. Santitores, “Frekuensi penyiraman larutan urin domba terhadap tinggi tanaman, jumlah daun dan produksi segar hidroponik fodder jagung (Zea mays),” J. Sains Peternak., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2020.
[19] F. R. B. Gardner, Pearce, and M. R.L., Fisiologi Tanaman Budidaya. UI Press, 1991.
[20] I. Wardhana, H. Hasbi, and I. Wijaya, “Response growth and production lettuce plants (lactuca sativa l.) on the granting of fertilizer dose coop goat and liquid fertilizer application interval time super bionic],” Agritrop J. Ilmu-Ilmu Pertan., no. 7, pp. 165–185, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adib Norma Respati, Suci Wulandari, Satria Budi Kusuma, Wahyu Firmansyah, Firli Ramadhan, Amal Bahariawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
