Soy-Groundnut Suya Meat Analogue Compared with Beef Control: A Nutritional, Phytochemical and Quality Evaluation

Authors

  • Comfort Chinenye Nwagbo Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Igbariam Campus, Anambra State, Nigeria.
  • Ozioma Amarachi Ozuzu Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Igbariam Campus, Anambra State, Nigeria.
  • Felix Emeka Okpalanma Madonna University, Enugu State, Nigeria
  • Uzoamaka Francisca Muotolu Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Igbariam Campus, Anambra State, Nigeria.
  • Nebechi Roseline Obetta University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25047/tefa.v3i2.7102

Keywords:

plant-based protein, meat analogue, suya, soybean, groundnut, proximate composition, texture profile analysis, phytochemicals, sensory evaluation

Abstract

Growing demand for sustainable, affordable, and nutritionally adequate plant-based proteins has intensified interest in meat analogues as viable alternatives to animal-source foods. This study investigated the use of complementary legume proteins from soybean (Glycine max) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in producing a culturally relevant suya-type meat analogue. Three soy-groundnut suya meat analogues (SGMS1: 50:50%; SGMS2: 60:40%; SGMS3: 70:30%) were formulated and evaluated against a 100% beef suya control (MS) for proximate and mineral composition (AOAC, 2023), vitamin content (HPLC), phytochemical profile (spectrophotometry), textural attributes (texture profile analysis), CIELab colour parameters, and sensory acceptability (9-point hedonic scale). Protein content increased significantly (p < 0.05) with soy–groundnut inclusion, peaking at 33.61 mg/100g in SGMS3 versus 24.23 mg/100g in MS, while crude fat declined from 13.51 to 7.59 mg/100g. SGMS2 recorded the highest concentrations of magnesium, potassium, phosphorus, calcium, and iron, as well as total phenolics (164.37 mg/100g). SGMS3 showed the highest niacin, pyridoxine, flavonoid, and zinc values. Textural parameters increased progressively with soy inclusion. Sensory acceptability scores ranged from 5.90 to 6.20 for the analogues versus 8.10 for the control. Soy-groundnut meat analogues improved nutritional quality over conventional beef suya, with SGMS2 emerging as the most balanced formulation. Targeted sensory optimization is required before commercial adoption.

References

[1] Nations, U. (2019). United Nations Department of Economic and social affairs. Sustainable development goal, 2.

[2] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, "The Future of Food and Agriculture: Trends and Challenges," FAO, Rome, 2016.

[3] B. Romão, M. Sommo, R. P. Zandonadi, M. E. M. de Holanda, V. R. P. Borges, A. Saraiva, and A. Raposo, "Sustainability of key proteins in plant-based meat analogs production: a worldwide perspective," Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 382, 2025.

[4] F. Boukid, "Plant-based meat analogues: From niche to mainstream," Eur. Food Res. Technol., vol. 247, no. 2, pp. 297–308, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00217-020-03630-3.

[5] L. Yu, Q. Liu, and G. Zhao, "Advances in the production and application of plant-based meat analogues," Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 289–317, 2023.

[6] G. J. Hughes, D. J. Ryan, R. Mukherjea, and C. S. Schasteen, "Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS) for soy protein isolates and concentrate," J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 59, no. 23, pp. 12707–12712, 2011.

[7] K. Kyriakopoulou, B. Dekkers, and A. J. van der Goot, "Plant-based meat analogues," in Sustainable Meat Production and Processing, C. M. Galanakis, Ed. Academic Press, 2021, pp. 103–126.

[8] F. Mariotti and C. D. Gardner, "Dietary protein and amino acids in vegetarian diets — A review," Nutrients, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 2661, 2019, doi: 10.3390/nu11112661.

[9] M. Messina, "Soy and health update: Evaluation of the clinical and epidemiologic literature," Nutrients, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 754, 2016, doi: 10.3390/nu8120754.

[10] C. E. O'Neil, D. R. Keast, T. A. Nicklas, and V. L. Fulgoni, "Nut consumption is associated with decreased health risk factors for cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome," J. Am. Coll. Nutr., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 525–533, 2010.

[11] G. Sorita, C. Almeida, and M. Torres, "Phenolic compounds in peanut skins and their antioxidant properties," J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1502–1510, 2022.

[12] AOAC International, Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 22nd ed. AOAC International, Rockville, MD, 2023.

[13] R. R. Eitenmiller, W. O. Landen, and L. Ye, Vitamin Analysis for the Health and Food Sciences, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2016.

[14] V. L. Singleton and J. A. Rossi, "Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents," Am. J. Enol. Vitic., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 144–158, 1965.

[15] C. C. Chang, M. H. Yang, H. M. Wen, and J. C. Chern, "Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods," J. Food Drug Anal., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 178–182, 2002.

[16] M. C. Bourne, Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York, 2002.

[17] M. O. Iwe, Handbook of Sensory Methods and Analysis. Rojoint Communication Services Ltd., Enugu, Nigeria, 2010.

[18] D. Suleman, S. Bashir, F. U. Hassan Shah, A. Ikram, M. Zia Shahid, T. Tufail, A. Ahmad Khan, F. Ahsan, S. Ambreen, A. Raza, and M. Hassan Mohamed, "Nutritional and functional properties of cookies enriched with defatted peanut cake flour," Cogent Food & Agriculture, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2238408, 2023.

[19] D. Kolev, T. Popova, and I. Nacheva, "Effect of soy protein addition on the nutritional and physicochemical properties of sausages," LWT – Food Sci. Technol., vol. 194, p. 115811, 2024.

[20] A. Ishaq, A. Bello, and A. Yusuf, "Nutritional and sensory evaluation of plant-based meat analogues enriched with legumes," J. Food Process. Preserv., vol. 46, no. 3, p. e16245, 2022.

[21] U.S. Department of Agriculture, "FoodData Central," USDA, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/ (accessed 20 March 2025).

[22] W. J. Craig, "Health effects of vegan diets," Am. J. Clin. Nutr., vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1627S–1633S, 2009, doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736N.

[23] T. A. El-Adawy, E. H. Rahma, A. A. El-Bedawey, and A. E. El-Beltagy, "Nutritional and functional properties of germinated legume seeds," Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 279–289, 2000.

[24] W. Zhang, Y. Peng, and S. Wang, "Mineral and phytochemical profiles of diverse peanut varieties grown under controlled conditions," Food Chem., vol. 432, p. 137205, 2024.

[25] M. Hanna, E. Jaqua, V. Nguyen, and J. Clay, "B vitamins: Functions and uses in medicine," Permanente J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 89–97, 2022, doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.204.

[26] S. Liu, X. Wang, and L. Huang, "Thermal degradation of tocopherols in peanut products during roasting and processing," J. Food Compos. Anal., vol. 137, p. 106891, 2025.

[27] A. D. de Matos, A. M. M. Costa, and R. Pereira, "Antioxidant-rich phenolic fractions from peanut by-products: Extraction and bioactivity assessment," Food Chem., vol. 438, p. 138010, 2024.

[28] T. Zhang, P. Zhou, and W. Sun, "Plant protein-based meat alternatives: Structure, processing, and sensory properties," Foods, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 2436, 2021.

[29] X. Jiang, Y. Zhu, and H. Zhang, "Plant protein network formation and its role in hardness and chewiness of meat analogues," Food Hydrocoll., vol. 148, p. 109412, 2024.

[30] P. Srikanlaya, S. Kittibunchakul, and V. Jindal, "Texture modification of soy-based meat alternatives: Role of processing and rehydration," Food Hydrocoll., vol. 143, p. 108806, 2024.

[31] X. Wu, Y. Lin, and Q. Chen, "Effect of plant protein substitution on CIELab colour parameters and oxidative stability of processed meat," Meat Sci., vol. 207, p. 109374, 2024.

[32] T. Daszkiewicz, D. Kubiak, and K. Śmiecińska, "Quality and sensory attributes of plant-enriched meat products: A systematic review," Foods, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 1032, 2023, doi: 10.3390/foods12051032.

[33] S. Grahl, M. Palanisamy, M. Strack, J. Engelken, and D. Mörlein, "Towards a more sustainable meat alternative: Consumer perception of a lupin-based patty," J. Clean. Prod., vol. 249, p. 119423, 2020.

[34] J. Oh, J. Kim, and H. Lee, "Consumer hedonic responses to beef versus plant-based beef alternatives: A comparative sensory study," Meat Sci., vol. 209, p. 109428, 2025.

[35] L. Sha and Y. L. Xiong, "Plant protein-based alternatives of reconstructed meat: Science, technology, and challenges," Trends Food Sci. Technol., vol. 102, pp. 51–61, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.022.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-16

How to Cite

Nwagbo, C. C., Ozuzu, O. A., Okpalanma, F. E., Muotolu, U. F., & Obetta, N. R. (2026). Soy-Groundnut Suya Meat Analogue Compared with Beef Control: A Nutritional, Phytochemical and Quality Evaluation. International Journal of Technology, Food and Agriculture, 3(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.25047/tefa.v3i2.7102

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.