Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Agroindustri Teh Kebun Bantaran PT Perkebunan Nusantara XII

Authors

  • Bambang Herry Purnomo
  • I. B. Suryaningrat
  • Aulia Brilliantina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25047/jii.v17i1.463

Abstract

Corporate performance can be measured financially and non-financially. Non-financial measurements cannot be separated from the financial measurements. The aims of this study was to describe of how performance measurement systems that has been conducted at tea agroindustry on Kebun Bantaran PT Perkebunan Nusantara XII to achieve success areas of tea agroindustry. The system was built to adopt from Integrated Dynamic Performance Measurement Systems (IDPMS) model. Interviews, observations, and company’s documents were conducted to gather empirical information regarding the needs of developing new appraisal system. Four integrated functional area of the models are corporate management, factory management, production line, and lab QC. Each functional areas were linked through the specification, reporting, and dynamic updating of the defined areas of success, performance measure, and performance standard. Understanding interrelatioships of performance measurements provides the foundation for more focused improvement effort.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Busi M and US Bititchi. 2006. Collaborative Performance Management ; Present Gap and Future Research. Int’l. J. Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2006, pp. 7-25

BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik). 2015. Ekspor Teh Menurut Negara Tujuan. www.bps.go.id

Cross, K.F. and Lynch, R.I. The SMART way to define and sustain success. National productivity Review. 1989; vol.8, no. 1, pp. 23-33

Dixon, J et al. 1990. The New Performance Challenge : Measuring Operations for World – Class Competition. DowJones Irwin, IL

Elizabeth. (2000). Hubungan Laba Akuntansi dan Arus Kas Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan. Jurnal RisetAkuntansi Indonesia, 6(2): 76-85

Ghalayini AM, JS Noble dan TJ Crowe. 1997. An Integrated Dynamic Performance Measurement System for Improving Manufacturing Competitiveness. Int’l. J. OfProduction Economics, 48, p. 207-225.

Ghani, M. A. 2002. Buku Pintar Mandor : Dasar-Dasar Budi Daya Teh. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta. 134 hal.

Gibson et al. (1994). Organisasi. Jilid 1. alih bahasa Agus Dharma. Jakarta: Erlangg

Indonesia Tea Board. 2015. Areal Produksi Teh. www.indonesiateaboard.org

Kaplan RS dan DP Norton. 1996. Balanced Scorecard, Translating Strategi into Action. Terjemahan. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga

Nazir M. 1999. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia

Peppard and Rowland. 1995. The Essence of Business Process Re-Engineering. Prentice-Hall International

Rayati, D.J dan Widayat, Wahyu. 2009. More Than A Cup Of Tea. Bandung : Pusat Penelitian Teh dan Kina

Soedradjat, Rulan. 1986. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Mutu Teh Hitam. Bandung : Balai Penelitian Teh dan Kina

Susanto, Carlina. 1974. Tea Processing. Rome : Food And Agriculture Organization of The United Nations

Tobroni, M dan S. Adimulya. 1997. Petunjuk Kultur Teknik Tanaman Teh. Edisi 2. Pusat Penelitian Teh dan Kina. Gambung . 151 hal.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-14

How to Cite

Purnomo, B. H., Suryaningrat, I. B., & Brilliantina, A. (2017). Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Agroindustri Teh Kebun Bantaran PT Perkebunan Nusantara XII. Jurnal Ilmiah Inovasi, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.25047/jii.v17i1.463

Issue

Section

Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)